Kommunal.az

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Psilocybin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Assume good faith
Be polite and avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Psilocybin is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 29, 2012.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 19, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
October 12, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
January 18, 2012	Featured article candidate	Promoted
March 4, 2023	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Altered States of Consciousness (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi High‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by .

Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2024 and 23 February 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ChasYoung4 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by ChasYoung4 (talk) 04:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recent large changes

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Re this.[1] Medical content should be based on high-quality sources. Non-MEDLINE indexed Frontiers Media journals, and in particular Cureus, are suspect. Bon courage (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

While I see your point about Cureus, all of these articles were acquired through PubMED and are all from peer-reviewed journals. ChasYoung4 (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

See WP:MEDFAQ#I have a source from PubMed, so that's reliable right?. Bon courage (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Perceived spiritual experience

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the difference between a perceived and a real spiritual experience? Isn't "perceived spiritual experience" a pleonasm? PhilClewie (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Who is right? PubChem or Wikipedia?

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Who is wrong? According to PubChem, the molecule pictured in this article is this one, while psilocybin is that one. 202.171.188.236 (talk) 15:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Potential bias

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've noticed the 'Effects' section is very long while the 'Adverse Effects' section is very short (the caveat being 'Interactions' and similar making up more 'negative effect' length, but not being organized that way in technicality). Please analyze this and see if changing the organization can make the information look more neutral. ~2026-50158-7 (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

New review from Nature

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-026-00630-8

Best way to integrate this new high-quality living review in the Research section? FrootLuups (talk) 21:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply