Kommunal.az

Smithsonian Institution Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

copyright/plagarism issue

Question concerning the copyright of this: The page this was copied from, http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/goodyear_xao.htm, says, at the bottom of the page, Copyright © 1998-2000 National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution (revised 10/9/01 D. Daso) This is an Air and Space Museum/Smithsonian Institution website. How is this material copyrighted? RickK 05:12, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Presumably the answer is in http://www.nasm.si.edu/help/copyright.cfm which includes: "All National Air and Space Museum web pages and content are copyright Smithsonian Institution. All banners, icons, logos and original graphics on the National Air and Space Museum web site are also copyright Smithsonian Institution and may not be used for any purpose.... Q: Is it true that all Smithsonian Institution images are public domain because Smithsonian is a federal government institution? A: No. Many images (as well as artifacts) in the Smithsonian collection have further copyright limitations attached to them. The fact that the Smithsonian receives partial funding from the federal government only affects whether images taken by Smithsonian employees are technically protected by copyright. It does not affect image ownership or usage rights, which the Smithsonian retains (i.e. even in the absence of copyright, Smithsonian still reserves all rights to image use)." I find the final statement slightly unusual.--Henrygb 22:19, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Sounds rather over-reaching to me. However, this is the trick a lot of museums want to pull: they want to make it very difficult to determine the copyright status of items in their collection.

Another thing I've seen done is placing restrictions on even out-of-copyright items through requiring contracts before access. IOW, you have to sign away your rights to freely copy an out-of-copyright document before you are allowed to see / copy it. I wonder if that's what that last sentence refers to? —Morven 22:39, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

The work may have been created by a trust employee instead of a federal employee, in which case it would not enter the public domain automatically. The retention of rights to non-copyrighted items appears to be meaningless FUD. You don't get to retain rights to works in the public domain, except perhaps some limited moral rights. A contract to try to recapture rights to a public domain work is of no effect. That still doesn't prevent people from trying to mislead potential reusers by making bogus claims. In any case, as a text article, it's far more work to seek permission to use this (which would probably be declined if it's not in the public domain) than it is to rewwrite it, so it's not worth pursing. Jamesday 14:42, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Wired plagarism

Tony Long of Wired Magazine plagarized from this article (specifically the opening sentences were lifted unchanged.) http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/multimedia/2008/07/gallery_experimental_50s_aircraft?slide=6&slideView=6 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.82.108.78 (talk) 11:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

detailed magazine article with photographs

I read this article a long time ago; someone with access to back issues at a library would definitely find it interesting if they were curious as to the handling characteristics, etc. of the Inflatoplane. I think that the information from this magazine article would make a positive contribuion to the Wikipedia article.
Blowing Up Your Own Airplane (test flying Goodyear's Inflatoplane) by Chuck Berthe, Kitplanes, July 1996, p. 26.

Photo or Diagram of a deflated plane

This article would benefit from a photo or diagram of a deflated plane as one great advantage is portability.

31.68.64.216 (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube Link

I have found a decent-ish source for some details of the aircraft, It is a Youtube clip of the CBS show "I've Got a Secret" where they spend a good ten minutes talking about and demonstrating the plane.

Youtube: "I've Got a Secret" - Inflatable 'Inflatoplane' Airplane YouTube

But I have no other information about this episode of the this VERY long running show, so I'm not sure how to go about constructing the reference in proper wikipedia style.

I botched it the first time I tried, so I need to brush up on what I am doing, but the information added is accurate, just not YET properly cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.20.31.86 (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J. Thomas Blair demonstrating in 1956 from another source

To the best of my ability I have patched in a ref for the episode in question, not wild about it but not sure how to improve itJmackaerospace (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]